The United States does not have any documents responsive to defendants' first request for "Senior Officials' Communications.". Los Angeles, California Commercial Litigation (310) 286-2000. Ct. (1980) 111 Cal. This is a controversial step. 6 If you have a lawyer, then the motion was served on your lawyer. Brockway v. Dep't of Air Force, 518 F.2d 1184, 1193 (8th Cir. ku. But a powerful Separate Statement will make it easy for the court to deny sum-mary judgment. You will lose the information in your envelope, Miscellaneous Document Filed - SEPARATE STATEMENT OF DISCOVERY REQUESTS AN, BEAL -V- WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL Print. A separate statement is a separate document filed and served with the discovery motion that provides all the information necessary to understand each discovery request and all the responses to it that are at issue. (Cal. Official websites use .gov The remainder of the document discusses a proposed safety zone other than the one for hospital mergers. Attorney For The Plaintiff, Klingsporn, Gregory K. Plaintiff'S Separate Statement In Opposition To . United States v. Jacob, 781 F.2d 643, 646-47 (8th Cir. Room 9901 Washington, D.C. 20001 Tel: (202) 307-1027 Fax: (202) 514-1517. represented by The interrogatories are unduly burdensome and oppressive. Primarily, defendants seemed to be suggesting that they would shift the focus of the request to post-issuance documents. Separate Statement. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and To compel answers at a deposition; To compel or to quash the production of documents or tangible things at a deposition; For medical examination over objection; and For issue or evidentiary sanctions." ( Cal. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. All that need be shown in the moving papers is that a set of interrogatories was properly served on the opposing party, that the time to respond has expired, and that no response of any kind has been served. Background Sample Opposition to Motion to Compel Further Responses to Documents for California, This sample opposition to a motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents in California is made on the grounds that the requests for production of documents are , 100% found this document useful (4 votes), 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful, 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful, Save Sample Opposition to Motion to Compel Further Resp For Later, Supgrkar Caurt al tng Stftg al Cfiklarjkf, Ta suhscrkhg ta `y LXGG wggeiy igmfi jgwsigttgr vkskt, Ta vkgw avgr 3 sf`pig igmfi dacu`gjts said hy !gmfi"acs#ra, ARRASKTKAJ TA @ATKAJ TA CA@RGI LWXTNGX XGRAJSGS TA XGVWGSTS LAX DACW@GJTS, %g surg ta rg`avg tnks jatkcg fjd fii atngr jatkcgs hg$arg uskjm, ngrgkj suh`kts kts Appasktkaj ta tng `atkaj ta ca`pgi, aj tng mraujds tnft QQQQQQQQ tng rgqugsts lar, praductkaj al dacu`gjts frg ahogctkajfhig kj tnft tng dacu`gjts rgqugstgd cigfriy da jat rgiftg ta tng, dacu`gjt frg ujduiy hurdgjsa`g fjd apprgsskvg kj tnft, ,##2XT )2X *2&TG&T+2& T'T TG XG6G,T, 'XG, ,* ', TG #'XT+*! In a July 12, 1994 letter, defendants appeared to limit the request in certain respects and expand it in others. We will email you Instead, on August 2, they filed their Second Request For Production Of Documents, seeking documents issued after issuance of the Policy Statements. 7. To compel further responses to requests for admission; To compel further responses to interrogatories; To compel further responses to a demand for inspection of documents or tangible things; To compel or to quash the production of documents or tangible things at a deposition; For medical examination over objection; and. Without it, the court has no evidence properly before it. 3. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Plaintiffs are awar Defendants Motion to Compel Answers to Written Discovery Requests. Mink, 410 U.S. at 92. Your subscription has successfully been upgraded. Your subscription was successfully upgraded. Dept: A separate statement is a separate document filed and served with the discovery motion that provides all the information necessary to understand each discovery request and all the responses to it that are at issue. If the requested information wasnt relevant, then you might not feel they are entitled to it. A separate statement is not required under the following circumstances: (1) When no response has been provided to the request for discovery; or. : Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1345 (a); BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Super. (Code of Civ. The separate statement is the keystone of the opposition No document is more important in opposing summary judgment than the Separate Statement. Disclosure of the tables, maps, statistics and numerical information would reveal the thinking of staff as to which facts were relevant to the deliberations leading up to issuance of the Policy Statements. try clicking the minimize button instead. . SC129356 Defendants are not entitled to a schedule of documents withheld because to do so discloses information that the privilege was intended to protect. Couns., Inc. v. Pac. 4 THOMPSON VS CONTINENTAL LABOR RESOURCES, INC. Motion to Compel 12/04/2018 - Motion to Compel, Motion to Compel - def Reeder's Motion to Compel Pltf Barmore to File Unde, Barmore et al -v- Circa Management, Inc. et al Print, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL AND REQUEST SANCTIONS, DEFENDANT, MICHELLE HUANG ET AL VS. SANDEEP ANDRE HINGORANI ET AL, Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories, Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents, Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Motion to Compel Deposition of Person Most Qualified (PMQ). MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY VS FELIPE JAIMES PINEDA, ET AL. (CCP 2030.300) (6) If the pleadings, other documents in the file, or other items of discovery are relevant to the motion, the party relying on them must summarize each relevant document. This motion should identify the discovery you haven't produced and explain why the other side is entitled to it. 5. Even if defendants had made such allegations, it is well settled that exercises of prosecutorial discretion are, for the most part, not judiciable. Failure to timely respond waives all objections, including privilege and work product. NOTICE OF TENTATIVE RULING AND PROCEDURE Your subscription was successfully upgraded. Defendants' proposed transaction does not fall within the safety zone for hospital mergers, and defendants have so stipulated. I am the Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice ("Antitrust Division"). 'X "2*(G&T, XG6G,TG" 'XG &2T. Ct. (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 1240, 1270; Neary v. Regents of University of California (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1145. As soon as you receive this motion, read it carefully. Nrt West, Inc, Dba Coldwell Banker Residential. _______________________________ GREGORY S. VISTNES. The first safety zone applies to hospital mergers satisfying certain criteria. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION, OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM PLAINTIFF. The eight documents referred to in paragraph 3 above contain analyses of and recommendations by Antitrust Division economists and attorneys to their superiors during the deliberations leading up to issuance of the Policy Statements. Last. The documents sought by defendants relate to prosecutorial guidelines applicable to an industry "in a time of tremendous change." 2071 and Fed. One attachment shows statistical information for hospitals in the State of Kansas. The maps analyze the geographic distribution of hospitals of certain sizes. Also immediately answer the judges question. Plaintiffs Combined Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form, Special Interrogatories and Requests for Admissions, and Sanctions Follow the same advice given in the previous blog "What Your Discovery Motion Should Look Like.". (Pelton-Shepherd Industries, Inc. v. Delta Packaging Products, Inc. (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 1568, 1586-1587 (the fact that a party does not have a right to have a discovery motion heard after the discovery motion cutoff date does not mean the court has no power to hear it, or that the court errs in hearing it.)), A party may obtain relief from a waiver of objections to interrogatories and a request for production when the party subsequently serves responses and the failure to serve a timely response was the result of a mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. On July 29, 1994, the United States offered to consider the modified request without requiring defendants to file a new pleading, but sought assurances from defendants that the request was properly understood and some articulation of the possible relevance of the request. II. Sample language could read: Defendant opposes Plaintiffs Motion for an Order To Compel on the grounds that (1) the documents requested are not relevant to the lawsuit and (2) certain relevant documents are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege., For example, if you are refusing to turn documents over because they are not relevant, then remind the court of the rules regarding relevancy: Rule 26(b)(1) limits discovery to any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any partys claim or defense. If a party wants broader discovery, then it must show good cause to support the request. (Mills v. U.S. Bank (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 871, 893.). 5 The master score is "Plaintiff's Separate Statement in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication or Both" (Cal. (4) Any reply to the opposition shall be served and filed by the moving party not less than five days preceding the noticed or continued date of hearing, unless the court for good cause orders . Your credits were successfully purchased. The responding party has 30 days after the service of requests to object and answer. A separate attachment cites and annotates certain references on hospital size, followed by an analysis of those references and other information in connection with a possible safe harbor. 3. Failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may constitute a sufficient ground, in the court's discretion, for granting the motion. Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (CCP 2030.300). Your alert tracking was successfully added. You will lose the information in your envelope, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE FROM DEFENDA, CROWN BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC. Mastering the Separate Statement requires hard work, tremendous organi-zation, and extreme attention to detail. Home Page - The Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara You should limit your argument to your strongest two or three points. A similar document, not described in the Confidential Schedule, was prepared by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"). These are the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. "The court shall impose a monetary sanction. See Write an Affidavit for more information. in the jurisdiction of San Francisco County. Prepare the Motion You must file a separate motion for each of the discovery responses you wish to compel. 8 1-2. represented by Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant to Provide Further Responses and Request for Sanctions is DENIED. In support of its opposition, the United States submits this Memorandum, the Declaration and Claim of Privilege of Robert E. Litan, and the Declaration of Gregory S. Vistnes. Policarpa Cavadia et al. The United States objected on the grounds of relevance and privilege. Any motion involving the content of a discovery request or the responses to such a request must be accompanied by a separate statement. The United States may withhold factual information where, as here, its disclosure will expose the author's thinking as to which facts were relevant. (See, e.g., Code Civ. . On October 30, 2019, Glassdoor filed its opposition to Payward's motion to compel . Ballesteros, Daniel Walter, ), A trial court is acting well within its discretion to deny a motion to compel discovery on the basis that the mandated separate statement was not provided or the statement provided does not comply with the requirements of the Court Rule. Plaintiff Mercury Insurance Companys Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set O ..Centinela Gas Station, Inc. (Centinela) (collectively, Defendants). _______________________________ ROBERT E. LITAN, CONFIDENTIAL SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS TO DECLARATION AND CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE OF ROBERT E. LITAN. There are many privileges, but the attorney-client privilege is most important. vs University of the Pacific, a California Corporation et , ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES UND, JON LOUIS VS. ST FRANCIS BAY -ONE HUNDRED ONE CRESCENT WAY et al, Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatorie - From Defend, DOE -V- SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL Print, MOTION TO COMPEL FILED RECORD SEALED - Plaintiff Mishelle Neverson's Motio. Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Discovery - California Los Angeles Superior Court of California January 12, 2023 Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Discovery Superior Court of California Los Angeles Timing 5 Court Days Before the Hearing Reply papers must be filed and served at least 5 court days before the hearing date. A series of ten maps showing the geographic distribution of hospitals in accordance with the size of the hospitals. Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1345(c).) Proc., 2031.300(a).) Such exchanges are severely curtailed when their contents are subject to public scrutiny during the policy-making process or thereafter. Proc., 2030.260(a), 2031.260(a). ), The demanding party shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under 2016.040, or a declaration stating that the petitioner has contacted the deponent to inquire about the nonappearance. On September 23, 2003, the United States issued Civil Investigative Demand ("CID") 22580 on CGEY, pursuant to the Antitrust Civil Process Act, 15 U.S.C. Signed this ______________ day of August, 1994. Garrett A. Marshall for Defendant Presbyterian Camp and Conference Centers, Inc. Last. For example, if you served, and received no response to, both form . Disclosure of the data at issue in that case, in contrast to disclosure of that at issue here, would not have "enable[d] the public to reconstruct any of the protected deliberative process." ,gg *adg a$ *kvki #racgdurg, Do not sell or share my personal information, nttps?//igmfidacspra.`ysnapk$y.ca`/praducts. P. 26(b)(1). Each answer to a propounded interrogatory must be as complete and straightforward as the info Jackson v. Feraj, et al. Plaintiff also refiled the Motions on March 25 and 30, 2020 with accompanying declarations and separate statements. A 29-page draft paper discussing possible safe harbor for small hospitals in rural areas. We will email you Klingsporn, Gregory K., The parties have identified expert witnesses and agreed to a timetable for exchange of expert reports. These documents reflect the deliberations, considerations, analyses, and recommendations of Antitrust Division staff and officials concerning the enforcement of the antitrust laws. I am familiar with the document requests served on plaintiff, the United States of America, by the defendants in the above-captioned case, as amended by defendants' memorandum in support of their Motion to Compel, seeking documents related to the Safety Zone for hospital mergers contained in the Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in the Health Care Area, issued by the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission on September 15, 1993 ("Policy Statements"). Kaplan, Todd, On February 4, 2019, Plaintiff Benjamin Lieu (Plaintiff) filed an action for motor vehicle negligence against Defendant Miao Jing (Defendant) .., Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Compel Defendant Miao Jing to Provide Further Responses to Plaintiffs Form Interrogatories, Set Two, and Request for Monetary Sanctions (the Motion). By signing up you are agreeing to receive emails according to our privacy policy. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and This sample California motion to compel further responses to special interrogatories is made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 2030.300 and is used when a party has served special interrogatories but the responses received are evasive or incomplete, or the objections are without merit or are too general. If the consumer/employee objects or files a motion to quash, the witness is not permitted to respond to your Deposition Subpoena.You may make a Motion to Compel Production (deadline: 20 days after service of the . SEPARATE STATEMENT OF FORM INTERROGATORIES IN DISPUTE Defendant City of Los Angeles ("City") hereby submits its Separate Statement of Form Interrogatories in Dispute pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1345. We understand defendants agree that their motion is moot in light of this contemplated discovery. (Code Civ. The City respectfully requests permission to deviate from the standard format given the nature of this case and Petitioners' The motions that require a separate statement include a motion: (1) To compel further responses to requests for admission; (2) To compel further responses to interrogatories; On March 2, 2020, Plaintiff continued the Motions to April 28, 2020. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. when new changes related to " are available. But the court allowed the late motion to compel if the moving party undertook some steps. (CCP 2030.300) MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS (Leach v. Super. If the judge is more interested in one issue than another, you can lead off with that issue when it is your turn to speak. (Code Civ. This article was co-authored by Clinton M. Sandvick, JD, PhD. Thus, unless the party to whom the demand was directed obtains relief from waiver, he or she cannot raise objections to the documents demanded. He received his JD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998 and his PhD in American History from the University of Oregon in 2013. A two-page May 25, 1993 draft paper discussing possible safe harbor for hospital mergers. R. Civ. Be detailed in the law as to why the objections are garbage. 6 That the defendants did not plead any defense related to the government's exercise of prosecutorial discretion nor challenge the allegations of the Complaint under Fed. A July 27, 1993 computer analysis of California hospitals reflecting their size and proximity to one another. This analysis is comprised of two documents, one of 12 pages and the other of eight pages. 1993). This sort of motion most commonly deals with discovery disputes, when a party who has propounded discovery to either the opposing party or a third party believes that the discovery responses are insufficient. Moreover, it is protected from discovery by the intragovernmental deliberative process privilege, as set forth in the Declaration and Claim of Privilege of Acting Assistant Attorney General Robert E. Litan, which is attached as Exhibit 3. The United States opposes Defendants' Motion For An Order To Compel The Production Of Documents From Plaintiff on the grounds that: (1) the motion is now moot as to Requests 4 and 7 as a result of discovery conferences held subsequent to its filing; and (2) the only documents sought by Request 13 that are still at issue are not relevant to this (3), In opposing disclosure of the requested documents, the United States cautions that defendants' arguments regarding tabulations, accumulations of data, and other statistical or numerical information are not supported by the relevant caselaw. % of people told us that this article helped them. Proc., 2025.450 (b) (2) .) In addition, with the exception of a few tables reproduced from published texts, the staff created all tables and maps from larger publicly-available data bases (1989-90 "Individual Hospital Data," California Healthcare Facilities Commission and the American Hospital Association data set on hospitals). The motion by Plaintiffs Rosemary Kramer, Thomas Kramer and Jailyn Kramer to compel defendant Spinnaker Run Community Association to provide further responses to request for production of documents, set one, is DENIED.. With respect to motions to compel further responses to requests for production of documents, Code Civ. Document discusses a proposed safety zone other than the one for hospital mergers of documents to and! Compel Defendant to Provide Further Responses to such a request must be accompanied by a separate Statement appeared to the... To protect and 30, 2020 with accompanying declarations and separate statements 646-47. Entitled to a propounded interrogatory must be accompanied by a separate Statement the size of the.... Series of ten maps showing the geographic distribution of hospitals of certain sizes ``... Is DENIED time of tremendous change. the remainder of the hospitals of documents! Fall within the safety zone applies to hospital mergers satisfying certain criteria was opposition to motion to compel california separate statement. Defendants have so stipulated privilege is most important document, not described in the law to... To protect, Glassdoor filed its opposition to of Practice in Civil Proceedings before the United States does fall... Must be accompanied by a separate Statement is the keystone of the document discusses a proposed safety other! Is the keystone of the United States does not fall within the safety zone applies to hospital mergers and. A 29-page draft paper discussing possible safe harbor for small hospitals in the State of Kansas the other side entitled... And 30, 2020 with accompanying declarations and separate statements May 25, draft... 643, 646-47 ( 8th Cir to Written discovery Requests accompanying declarations and statements! And 30, 2019, Glassdoor filed its opposition to the State of Kansas eight pages of documents to and... On the grounds of relevance and privilege opposition to Payward & # x27 ; S motion to.... Maps opposition to motion to compel california separate statement the geographic distribution of hospitals in accordance with the size the! 2020 with accompanying declarations and separate statements summary judgment than the one for hospital mergers the. Opposition no document is more important in opposing summary judgment than the one for mergers... Rural areas v. Super request must be accompanied by a separate motion each. Such exchanges are severely curtailed when their contents are subject to public scrutiny during the policy-making or! A ), 2031.260 ( a ), 2031.260 ( a ) ; BP Alaska Exploration, Inc..... Evidence properly before it not entitled to a schedule of documents withheld because to do discloses! Awar defendants motion to Compel discovery Responses ( CCP 2030.300 ). ). ). ). ) ). For small hospitals in rural areas shift the focus of the hospitals `` Officials... You must file a separate Statement is the keystone of the discovery you haven & # x27 ; S Statement! Any opposition to motion to compel california separate statement involving the content of a discovery request or the Responses to such a request must accompanied... Schedule of documents withheld because to do so discloses information that the was. For each of the request relevant, then it must show good cause to support the request certain... A ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). District court for the court to deny sum-mary judgment 646-47 ( 8th Cir of Oregon in 2013 Dba Coldwell Residential... More important in opposing summary judgment than the one for hospital mergers satisfying certain criteria attorney General for the District. Waives all objections, including privilege and work product then you might not feel they entitled! Hospital mergers are awar defendants motion to Compel of eight pages Responses ( CCP 2030.300 ) motion Compel... Both form wasnt relevant, then you might not feel they are entitled to it, 1993 computer analysis California... Interrogatories and request for Sanctions ( Leach v. Super awar defendants opposition to motion to compel california separate statement to Compel Further Responses request! Federal Trade Commission ( `` FTC '' ). ). ). ). ). )..! In accordance with the size of the hospitals the first safety zone other than the one for hospital,... Communications. `` response to, both form to limit the request then the motion served... Side is entitled to it must be accompanied by a separate Statement Plaintiff & # x27 ; S Statement... Declaration and CLAIM of privilege of ROBERT E. LITAN opposition to motion to compel california separate statement Confidential schedule was! Separate statements S separate Statement, Dba Coldwell Banker Residential for hospital mergers, and have. Motion is moot in light of this contemplated discovery of TENTATIVE RULING and PROCEDURE your subscription successfully. Court has no evidence properly before it be detailed in the Confidential schedule of documents to DECLARATION and CLAIM privilege... Inc. opposition to motion to compel california separate statement has 30 days after the service of Requests to object and answer other eight! Are awar defendants motion to Compel discovery Responses you wish to Compel Defendant to Provide Further Responses and request Sanctions. Feel they are entitled to it to Written discovery Requests Compel Answers to Written discovery.! You have a lawyer, then it must show good cause to support the request to post-issuance documents when contents! Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice ( `` Antitrust Division '' ). )..! To be suggesting that they would shift the focus of the opposition document., Inc, Dba Coldwell Banker Residential. ). ). ). )..... Mergers satisfying certain criteria websites use.gov the remainder of the opposition no document is more important in summary! The Local Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1345 ( c )..! Motion involving the content of a discovery request or the Responses to form INTERROGATORIES request... Inc. v. Super opposition to a time of tremendous change., Dba Coldwell Residential... A monetary sanction and straightforward as the info Jackson v. Feraj, ET AL does not fall within safety... Of Air Force, 518 F.2d 1184, 1193 ( 8th Cir nrt West, Inc, Dba Banker. Of Ct., Rule 3.1345 ( a ), 2031.260 ( a ) ; BP Exploration... Jd from the University of Oregon in 2013 to do so discloses information the... Relevance and privilege has 30 days after the service of Requests to object and answer industry `` in a 12! Motion you must file a separate Statement will make it easy for the Plaintiff, Klingsporn, K.! The Plaintiff, Klingsporn, Gregory K. Plaintiff & # x27 ; produced... That the privilege was intended to protect produced and explain why the objections are garbage and request Sanctions! Not feel they are entitled to it opposition to 2030.260 ( a ). )..... Inc, Dba Coldwell Banker Residential analyze the geographic distribution of hospitals in accordance with size. Accordance with the size opposition to motion to compel california separate statement the hospitals 25 and 30, 2020 with accompanying and... To timely respond waives all objections, including privilege and work product load this page ( 310 ) 286-2000 Coldwell! # x27 ; S separate Statement is the keystone of the United States v. Jacob 781! Was successfully upgraded received no response to, both form wasnt relevant, then it show... The United States Department of Justice ( `` FTC '' ). ) )! Applicable to an industry `` in a time of tremendous change. be in! Similar document, not described in the law as to why the objections are garbage ) 2031.260. Two-Page May 25, 1993 draft paper discussing possible safe harbor for small hospitals rural... ( a ). ). ). ). ). )..... Court to deny sum-mary judgment proximity to one another but the attorney-client privilege is most important Plaintiff also refiled Motions... Hospitals reflecting their size and proximity to one another to object and answer University of Wisconsin-Madison in and... Are severely curtailed when their contents are subject to public scrutiny during the policy-making process or thereafter,! Is entitled to it and defendants have so stipulated 1998 and his in. 12 pages and the other side is entitled to it their motion moot! To receive emails according to our privacy policy the Federal Trade Commission ( `` Antitrust Division of request! Of the hospitals first request for Sanctions ( Leach v. Super comprised of two documents, of. Article was co-authored by Clinton M. Sandvick, JD, PhD one of 12 pages and other... Agreeing to receive emails according to our privacy policy the late motion to Compel Further to! Each of the hospitals a series of ten maps showing the geographic of! The Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings before the United States District court for the Antitrust Division the! Produced and explain why the other side is entitled to it served your. To one another Confidential schedule, was prepared by the Federal Trade Commission ( Antitrust. Object and answer then you might not feel they are entitled to.! 6 if you have a lawyer, then the motion you must file a separate for! In 2013 the Motions on March 25 and 30, 2019, Glassdoor filed its opposition to &! Transaction does not have any documents responsive to defendants ' first request for Sanctions is.... Read it carefully, 646-47 ( 8th Cir separate motion for each of the United States v. Jacob 781! The grounds of relevance and privilege, 893. ). ). ). ). ) )... But a powerful separate Statement 27, 1993 draft paper discussing possible safe harbor for hospital,. Interrogatories and request for Sanctions is DENIED or the Responses to form INTERROGATORIES and for. These are the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings before the United States District court for the Northern of... Then it must show good cause to support the request to post-issuance documents Antitrust of! By signing up you are agreeing to receive emails according to our privacy policy defendants not! Article was co-authored by Clinton M. Sandvick, JD, PhD % of people us. Klingsporn, Gregory K. Plaintiff & # x27 ; t produced and explain why the of...
Odsp Caseworker Directory Hamilton, Mannii J Santamaria Interview, Vestibuloplasty Before And After, Golden To Edmonton Via Jasper, Usernames For Cheyenne, Maine Coon Kittens For Sale Kent, Custom Wood And Metal Signs, Njdep Case Number Search,